In Faust’s Grip: Apple’s Faustian Bargain in China and the Non-Flat World

Patrick McGee’s Apple in China: The Capture of the World’s Greatest Company strikes a deal with a country and becomes the most valuable organization known to date. It is an engaging profound read. It covers not only the rise of Apple but provides a warning to us all about how the world is no longer flat.

BOOK REVIEWS

John Spiegel

7/29/20254 min read

Growing up, the story of Faust’s bargain with Mephistopheles has always enamored me. Maybe it was my Lutheran upbringing, the fact that it is referred to in a song of my youth “Wrapped Around Your Finger” or reading Gothe’s treatment in German in College. I’ve always taken it as the warning it is meant to be. A timeless tale of ambition, compromise, and tragic overreach. So, when I started reading Patrick McGee’s Apple in China: The Capture of the World’s Greatest Company, my mind quickly spotted the backstory. A company strikes a deal with a country and becomes the most valuable organization known to date. It is an engaging profound read. It covers not only the rise of Apple but provides a warning to us all about how the world is no longer flat.

Apple’s decision to centralize nearly all iPhone production in China was driven by a desire for control, speed, and scale. However, as McGee reveals, this strategic move came with profound costs. Between 2016 and 2021, Apple invested more than $275 billion in China, an amount surpassing even the Marshall Plan in magnitude. While this gamble secured global dominance, it also forged a deep dependency. At the time, the bargain looked like a wise one. Invest in an emerging economy set to be the powerhouse of the 21st Century. The bet also seemed safe as the evolution to an open democratic China seemed preordained. More on that later….

In Goethe’s story, Faust makes a pact with Mephistopheles, trading his soul for unlimited knowledge and power. Similarly, Apple did the same. To comsumate the agreement, the deal with China included exchanging unmatched production efficiency for compliance with censorship, data localization, and regulatory concessions. To show this, McGee chronicles how Apple removed VPN apps, lost AirDrop features, and censored content in order to maintain market access. This dynamic perfectly embodies the Faustian bargain: short-term gains at the cost of long-term autonomy.

This dependency, much like Faust’s bondage, reveals a vulnerability that is not immediately apparent but deeply impactful. By 2020, nearly 90% of Apple’s products were assembled in China, leveraging Foxconn’s industrial ecosystem which is nearly unmatched anywhere else. McGee goes to lengths to describe the ecosystem surrounding the production of all thing iApple. And it is more than outsource labor; knowledge transfers, advanced production techniques, cutting edge design bureaus, just in time chip manufacturing to name a few. Meanwhile China keeps asking for more to the point where attempts to diversify production toward India and Vietnam become dependent on China. As McGee explains, the scale of this decoupling is daunting and will take years and significant investment to materialize if it can be done at all while maintaining current price points.

McGee’s analysis offers crucial lessons for today’s business leaders operating in a world that is decidedly non-flat—where geopolitical risks are global and asymmetric. The Apple-China story forces us to question the costs of scale, highlighting that growth often comes tethered to fragile dependencies. The efficiency gained through centralized production and a single dominant market can come at the expense of strategic autonomy. Resilience must be prioritized over optimization, as lean cost advantages can vanish overnight in an uncertain world. Moreover, the story highlights the asymmetric leverage held by China in this arrangement: Apple, by fostering Chinese engineering talent and industrial ecosystems, inadvertently empowered the very system that now wields influence over it. If you need evidence, do a quick search in the latest Huawei phones. Look familiar?

Apple’s Faustian bargain also carries a significant ethical dimension. Faust lost his moral soul in the deal, and Apple’s compromises have led to reputational risks and criticisms. McGee details how Apple suppressed content, removed politically sensitive news apps, and stored Chinese user data with state-backed providers. Such concessions contradict Apple’s professed brand values around privacy and individual freedom. Apple didn’t just outsource manufacturing; it outsourced influence over the very policies and controls that govern user experience.

What does this mean for you, the IT or Security leader? The Apple-China relationship underscores the risks of over-concentrating supply chains and digital infrastructure in a single geopolitical region or vendor. Faustian bargains often involve dependencies on external infrastructure, such as cloud providers or regional data centers, which can become points of leverage or disruption if political or regulatory winds shift. IT leaders must carefully balance governance and compliance, ensuring that platform or regional mandates don’t erode broader principles or expose the company to reputational or legal risks elsewhere. The reversal of knowledge flows that McGee describes—where Apple’s own technology and expertise ultimately benefited China more than Apple—serves as a cautionary tale about managing knowledge transfer in partnerships. Finally, the lesson from Faust is clear: short-term scaling gains should never come at the cost of losing control or strategic flexibility.

Goethe’s Faust ultimately recognizes the steep price of his pact, and for today’s corporations, the antidote lies in thoughtful strategic diversification. This means not only building multi-region supply chains and hybrid cloud environments but also embedding ethical frameworks that set clear boundaries for what concessions are acceptable. Companies must retain institutional knowledge and competitive advantage even as they partner globally, and engage in rigorous scenario planning to prepare for political, regulatory, or operational disruptions that could upend their assumptions.

Apple in China is far from a celebration of corporate triumph. Instead, it reads as a cautionary tale about how one of the world’s most valuable brands built both its success and vulnerability through a Faustian pact with China. In the complex, non-flat world we live in today, no ocean is neutral, and every business decision is enmeshed in geopolitics, supply chain complexity, and ethical tension. Business and IT leaders alike must become modern-day Fausts: ambitious yet cautious, aware of the true costs behind the alluring promises of scale and access.

Ultimately, Apple in China is a clarion call to leaders everywhere. When you encounter “China pace” or “low-cost advantage,” pause and ask yourself: what are we surrendering in exchange? And will we be able to reclaim it when the bargain’s true price comes due?